tg-me.com/SOSAmerica/3099
Last Update:
https://itsgoingdown.org/this-is-america-174/
BY SOS π
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/OObl5ChWR2r0aK5wzF8u8LGPSplWu4ZFQrca7o6Sm-vysq39qpAeT563IpEZXWGQdfj7nGyzrOEQQYvYGDcw4Qbmon6prXV1rZ17eoOae31f-_EK2F8cUv52bcRqWjzgVVVrpIVKjeL9Cyf9LD6417tBAQ-9HZGGTvu9x77r4RnYUsupx1D9cHI3IUxNPtNT3Zn0CcqX4Ov-TzszYCdYP-EZkC_7vDAZcjaqKPzM4Ph9Fo7vJHTJsJxyXItVp-ZKw0r69J3hBGExsYQljpom9RaYCGaLSP3V2PmF2naM-gxCvsuOCkHwTIrrFe8hdTmI-GrYU0LB_5BD-GgUUqGZnQ.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/SOSAmerica/3099
https://itsgoingdown.org/this-is-america-174/
BY SOS π
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
SOS π from vn